Errors & Typos

Main Index Articles Index

In many articles I cover a wide range of topics, and it's inevitable that there will be the odd error or typo.  If found, please contact me and let me know.  My goal is to provide accurate information, and if I have made an error I'd like to know so it can be fixed.  I checked through everything carefully, but in many articles there's a lot to cover, and being author and editor means that things can be missed.  If there are errors, I apologise in advance, and they will be fixed as soon as I'm made aware of the mistake (however minor it may seem).  Please provide article title, section number and your suggested correction.

If I find (or believe) that there is no error as reported, I will reply with the reasoning behind the relevant claim, formula or drawing.  It's entirely possible that my reasoning was at fault, although I do hope this isn't the case.  In some cases, my explanation will be based on providing a simplified way to explain a complex topic - this doesn't always work as well as it might.  I take great care to ensure that any circuitry described is accurate and functional, but errors can (and do) creep in from time-to-time.

Testing is often done using simulations, but a lot of circuits have also been built and tested (unless stated otherwise).  Graphs and charts are nearly always simulated, but scope captures are also used to show that the circuit does what is claimed.  That doesn't always mean that the description is 'typo free', as editing can displace references from the associated schematic or graph, or introduce inconsistencies that detract from the overall 'flow' of an article or project.

If you wish to comment (positive or negative), please do so.  Your feedback is an important part of making the ESP site as accurate as I can make it.

Cheers,    Rod Elliott

Contact ESP